BackScience Applications International Overview

Science Applications International Long Term Debt

Track Science Applications International's long-term debt ($2.6B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$2.65B
30.11% YoYΔ $613.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Science Applications International Long Term Debt History

Loading

Science Applications International vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Science Applications International Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Science Applications International (SAIC) FAQ

Science Applications International posts a long-term debt of $2.6B as of May 2026. That compares with $2B in the prior-year period — up 30.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Science Applications International's long-term debt was $2B. The latest reading is $2.6B — a 30.1% year-over-year increase (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Science Applications International's financial statement story. At $2.6B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SAIC's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Science Applications International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Science Applications International against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $2.6B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.