BackScience Applications International Overview

Science Applications International Current Cash

Track Science Applications International's current cash ($110M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Current Cash
$109.00M
131.91% YoYΔ $62.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Science Applications International Current Cash History

Loading

Science Applications International vs. peers: Current Cash Comparison

Loading

Science Applications International Cash Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Science Applications International (SAIC) FAQ

Science Applications International posts a current cash of $110M as of May 2026. That compares with $47M in the prior-year period — up 131.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Science Applications International's current cash was $47M. The latest reading is $110M — a 131.9% year-over-year increase (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Current Cash is one piece of Science Applications International's financial statement story. At $110M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SAIC's current cash usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Science Applications International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Science Applications International against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in current cash easier to interpret. Start with $110M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.