BackScience Applications International Overview

Science Applications International Accounts Payable

Track Science Applications International's accounts payable ($630M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$634.00M
5.09% YoYΔ $-34.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Science Applications International Accounts Payable History

Loading

Science Applications International vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Science Applications International Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Science Applications International (SAIC) FAQ

Science Applications International posts a accounts payable of $630M as of May 2026. That compares with $670M in the prior-year period — down 5.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Science Applications International's accounts payable was $670M. The latest reading is $630M — a 5.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Science Applications International's financial statement story. At $630M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SAIC's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Science Applications International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Science Applications International against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $630M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.