BackMadison Square Garden Class A Overview

Madison Square Garden Class A Total Liabilities

Madison Square Garden Class A's total liabilities is $1.4B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1.42B
21.63% YoYΔ $253.13M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Total Liabilities History

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A (MSG) FAQ

Madison Square Garden Class A posts a total liabilities of $1.4B as of December 2019. That compares with $1.2B in the prior-year period — up 21.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Madison Square Garden Class A's total liabilities was $1.2B. The latest reading is $1.4B — a 21.6% year-over-year increase (period ending December 2019). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Madison Square Garden Class A's financial statement story. At $1.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MSG's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Madison Square Garden Class A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Madison Square Garden Class A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.