BackMadison Square Garden Class A Overview

Madison Square Garden Class A Receivables

Madison Square Garden Class A's receivables is $130M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$130.89M
16.79% YoYΔ $-26.42M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Receivables History

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A (MSG) FAQ

Madison Square Garden Class A posts a receivables of $130M as of December 2019. That compares with $160M in the prior-year period — down 16.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Madison Square Garden Class A's receivables was $160M. The latest reading is $130M — a 16.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2019). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Madison Square Garden Class A's financial statement story. At $130M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MSG's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Madison Square Garden Class A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Madison Square Garden Class A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $130M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.