BackMadison Square Garden Class A Overview

Madison Square Garden Class A Long-Term Investments

Madison Square Garden Class A's long-term investments is $63M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long-Term Investments
$63.24M
32.93% YoYΔ $-31.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Long-Term Investments History

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A vs. peers: Long-Term Investments Comparison

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A Long-Term Investments Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Madison Square Garden Class A (MSG) FAQ

Madison Square Garden Class A posts a long-term investments of $63M as of December 2019. That compares with $94M in the prior-year period — down 32.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Madison Square Garden Class A's long-term investments was $94M. The latest reading is $63M — a 32.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending December 2019). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Investments is one piece of Madison Square Garden Class A's financial statement story. At $63M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MSG's long-term investments usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Madison Square Garden Class A's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Madison Square Garden Class A against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term investments easier to interpret. Start with $63M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.