BackAlpha Metallurgical Resources Overview

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Total Liabilities

Alpha Metallurgical Resources's total liabilities is $770M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$765.48M
84.36% YoYΔ $-4.13B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Total Liabilities History

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) FAQ

Alpha Metallurgical Resources posts a total liabilities of $770M as of March 2026. That compares with $4.9B in the prior-year period — down 84.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alpha Metallurgical Resources's total liabilities was $4.9B. The latest reading is $770M — a 84.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Alpha Metallurgical Resources's financial statement story. At $770M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AMR's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alpha Metallurgical Resources's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alpha Metallurgical Resources against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $770M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.