BackAlpha Metallurgical Resources Overview

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Net Tangible Assets

Alpha Metallurgical Resources's net tangible assets is $1.5B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$1.50B
89.70% YoYΔ $-13.06B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Alpha Metallurgical Resources (AMR) FAQ

Alpha Metallurgical Resources posts a net tangible assets of $1.5B as of June 2026. That compares with $15B in the prior-year period — down 89.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Alpha Metallurgical Resources's net tangible assets was $15B. The latest reading is $1.5B — a 89.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Alpha Metallurgical Resources's financial statement story. At $1.5B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for AMR's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Alpha Metallurgical Resources's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Alpha Metallurgical Resources against Energy peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Energy are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $1.5B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.