BackWaddell & Reed Financial Overview

Waddell & Reed Financial Total Liabilities

Track Waddell & Reed Financial's total liabilities ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$298.81M
25.69% YoYΔ $-103.28M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial Total Liabilities History

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial (WDR) FAQ

Waddell & Reed Financial posts a total liabilities of $300M as of March 2021. That compares with $400M in the prior-year period — down 25.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Waddell & Reed Financial's total liabilities was $400M. The latest reading is $300M — a 25.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Waddell & Reed Financial's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WDR's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Waddell & Reed Financial's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Waddell & Reed Financial against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.