BackWaddell & Reed Financial Overview

Waddell & Reed Financial Net Tangible Assets

Track Waddell & Reed Financial's net tangible assets ($560M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$563.50M
9.08% YoYΔ $-56.28M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Waddell & Reed Financial (WDR) FAQ

Waddell & Reed Financial posts a net tangible assets of $560M as of March 2021. That compares with $620M in the prior-year period — down 9.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Waddell & Reed Financial's net tangible assets was $620M. The latest reading is $560M — a 9.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Waddell & Reed Financial's financial statement story. At $560M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for WDR's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Waddell & Reed Financial's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Waddell & Reed Financial against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $560M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.