BackSmith & Wesson Brands Overview

Smith & Wesson Brands Total Current Liabilities

Track Smith & Wesson Brands's total current liabilities ($75M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$75.37M
13.10% YoYΔ $8.73M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Smith & Wesson Brands Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Smith & Wesson Brands vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Smith & Wesson Brands Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Smith & Wesson Brands (SWBI) FAQ

Smith & Wesson Brands posts a total current liabilities of $75M as of April 2026. That compares with $67M in the prior-year period — up 13.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Smith & Wesson Brands's total current liabilities was $67M. The latest reading is $75M — a 13.1% year-over-year increase (period ending April 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Smith & Wesson Brands's financial statement story. At $75M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for SWBI's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Smith & Wesson Brands's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Smith & Wesson Brands against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $75M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.