BackPowszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA Overview

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for PZAKY: $69B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$69.28B
7.07% YoYΔ $4.57B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA (PZAKY) FAQ

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA posts a net tangible assets of $69B as of June 2026. That compares with $65B in the prior-year period — up 7.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA's net tangible assets was $65B. The latest reading is $69B — a 7.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA's financial statement story. At $69B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for PZAKY's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $69B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.