BackOld Point Financial Overview

Old Point Financial Total Current Liabilities

Track Old Point Financial's total current liabilities ($3.3M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$3.32M
99.08% YoYΔ $-358.36M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Old Point Financial Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Old Point Financial vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Old Point Financial Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Old Point Financial (OPOF) FAQ

Old Point Financial posts a total current liabilities of $3.3M as of June 2025. That compares with $360M in the prior-year period — down 99.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Old Point Financial's total current liabilities was $360M. The latest reading is $3.3M — a 99.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2025). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Old Point Financial's financial statement story. At $3.3M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for OPOF's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Old Point Financial's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Old Point Financial against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $3.3M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.