BackNEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Overview

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Total Assets

Track NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's total assets ($2.4B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Assets
$2.40B
36.30% YoYΔ $638.40M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Total Assets History

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF vs. peers: Total Assets Comparison

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Total Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) FAQ

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF posts a total assets of $2.4B as of January 2018. That compares with $1.8B in the prior-year period — up 36.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's total assets was $1.8B. The latest reading is $2.4B — a 36.3% year-over-year increase (period ending January 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Assets is one piece of NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's financial statement story. At $2.4B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NIHI's total assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total assets easier to interpret. Start with $2.4B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.