BackNEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Overview

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Minority Interest

Track NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's minority interest ($310M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Minority Interest
$305.35M
103.35% YoYΔ $155.19M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Minority Interest History

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF vs. peers: Minority Interest Comparison

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF Minority Interest Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF (NIHI) FAQ

NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF posts a minority interest of $310M as of January 2018. That compares with $150M in the prior-year period — up 103.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's minority interest was $150M. The latest reading is $310M — a 103.4% year-over-year increase (period ending January 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Minority Interest is one piece of NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's financial statement story. At $310M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for NIHI's minority interest usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging NEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in minority interest easier to interpret. Start with $310M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.