BackArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Overview

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Profit Margin

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) has a profit margin of 2.88%, below the Materials sector average of 9.56%.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Profit Margin

4.07%
↓ 63.81% YoY

As of Jun 2026

Annual Profit Margin (TTM)

2.88%
↓ 29.93% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Jun 2026

Average Profit Margin (Comparison Companies)

Loading

Profit Margin History

Loading

Profit Margin Comparison

Loading

Annual Profit Margin Growth Rate (%)

Loading

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) FAQ

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's profit margin stands at 2.88% as of June 2026. That compares with 4.11% in the prior-year period — down 29.9% year over year. That is below the Materials sector average of 9.56%. Stockcircle updates this page with the newest filings so you can track how the metric evolves quarter by quarter.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III reported 2.88% in profit margin versus 4.11% a year earlier — a 29.9% year-over-year decrease. The historical chart on this page makes it easier to see whether that move is part of a longer pattern.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III sits lower the Materials benchmark (9.56%) with a profit margin of 2.88%. That is roughly 69.9% below the sector mean. Peer context matters because what looks expensive or cheap in absolute terms can be normal for the sector.

A profit margin of 2.88% for ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III means each unit of related capital or sales is generating that return rate. Higher is usually better for profitability metrics, but extremely high figures can reflect one-time items or thin equity bases. Review several years of data on this page before extrapolating.

The history chart shows how ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's profit margin evolved across reporting periods, while the comparison chart places MT next to similar companies. Use both: a rising metric that still lags peers tells a different story than a rising metric that already leads the group. Growth charts, when available, highlight acceleration or slowdown.