BackArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Overview

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III Operating Income

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's operating income is $3.6B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow

Quarterly Operating Income

$753.00M
8.73% YoY

As of Mar 31, 2026

Annual Operating Income (TTM)

$3.56B
14% YoY

Trailing 12 months ending Mar 31, 2026

Average Operating Income (Comparison Companies)

Operating Income History

Operating Income Comparison

Annual Operating Income Growth Rate (%)

Annual Operating Income Growth (Absolute)

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) FAQ

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III (MT) currently reports a operating income of $3.6B as of March 2026. That compares with $4.1B in the prior-year period — down 14.0% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's operating income history and peer comparisons.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III's operating income decreased from $4.1B to $3.6B — a 14.0% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III reported $3.6B in operating income as of March 2026. That compares with $4.1B in the prior-year period — down 14.0% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current operating income of $3.6B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III, and consider following MT for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

ArcelorMittal - New York Shares - Level III is classified in the Materials sector. On operating income, it currently shows $3.6B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Materials are usually more informative than comparing MT with unrelated industries.