BackMelco Resorts & Entertainment Overview

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Receivables

Track Melco Resorts & Entertainment's receivables ($140M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$141.16M
11.21% YoYΔ $14.23M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Receivables History

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) FAQ

Melco Resorts & Entertainment posts a receivables of $140M as of March 2026. That compares with $130M in the prior-year period — up 11.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Melco Resorts & Entertainment's receivables was $130M. The latest reading is $140M — a 11.2% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Melco Resorts & Entertainment's financial statement story. At $140M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MLCO's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Melco Resorts & Entertainment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Melco Resorts & Entertainment against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $140M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.