BackMelco Resorts & Entertainment Overview

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Long Term Debt

Track Melco Resorts & Entertainment's long-term debt ($6.5B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$6.54B
11.41% YoYΔ $-842.24M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Long Term Debt History

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Melco Resorts & Entertainment (MLCO) FAQ

Melco Resorts & Entertainment posts a long-term debt of $6.5B as of March 2026. That compares with $7.4B in the prior-year period — down 11.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Melco Resorts & Entertainment's long-term debt was $7.4B. The latest reading is $6.5B — a 11.4% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Melco Resorts & Entertainment's financial statement story. At $6.5B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MLCO's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Melco Resorts & Entertainment's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Melco Resorts & Entertainment against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $6.5B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.