BackMacquarie Infrastructure Overview

Macquarie Infrastructure Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for MIC: $31M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$30.70M
91.54% YoYΔ $-332.39M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure (MIC) FAQ

Macquarie Infrastructure posts a total current liabilities of $31M as of March 2022. That compares with $360M in the prior-year period — down 91.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Macquarie Infrastructure's total current liabilities was $360M. The latest reading is $31M — a 91.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Macquarie Infrastructure's financial statement story. At $31M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MIC's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Macquarie Infrastructure's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Macquarie Infrastructure against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $31M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.