BackMacquarie Infrastructure Overview

Macquarie Infrastructure Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for MIC: $180M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$182.48M
208.31% YoYΔ $350.97M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Macquarie Infrastructure (MIC) FAQ

Macquarie Infrastructure posts a net tangible assets of $180M as of March 2022. That compares with $-170M in the prior-year period — up 208.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Macquarie Infrastructure's net tangible assets was $-170M. The latest reading is $180M — a 208.3% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2022). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Macquarie Infrastructure's financial statement story. At $180M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for MIC's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Macquarie Infrastructure's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Macquarie Infrastructure against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $180M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.