BackLearning Tree International Overview

Learning Tree International Receivables

Learning Tree International's receivables is $8.6M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$8.64M
11.11% YoYΔ $-1.08M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Learning Tree International Receivables History

Loading

Learning Tree International vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Learning Tree International Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Learning Tree International (LTRE) FAQ

Learning Tree International posts a receivables of $8.6M as of September 2018. That compares with $9.7M in the prior-year period — down 11.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Learning Tree International's receivables was $9.7M. The latest reading is $8.6M — a 11.1% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Learning Tree International's financial statement story. At $8.6M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LTRE's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Learning Tree International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Learning Tree International against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $8.6M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.