BackLearning Tree International Overview

Learning Tree International Long Term Debt

Learning Tree International's long-term debt is $250K.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Long Term Debt
$250000.00
89.34% YoYΔ $-2.10M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Learning Tree International Long Term Debt History

Loading

Learning Tree International vs. peers: Long Term Debt Comparison

Loading

Learning Tree International Long Term Debt Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Learning Tree International (LTRE) FAQ

Learning Tree International posts a long-term debt of $250K as of September 2018. That compares with $2.3M in the prior-year period — down 89.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Learning Tree International's long-term debt was $2.3M. The latest reading is $250K — a 89.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Long-Term Debt is one piece of Learning Tree International's financial statement story. At $250K, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LTRE's long-term debt usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Learning Tree International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Learning Tree International against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in long-term debt easier to interpret. Start with $250K here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.