BackLennox International Overview

Lennox International Other Current Liabilities

Lennox International's other current liabilities is $370M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$373.40M
266.40% YoYΔ $597.80M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Lennox International Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Lennox International vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Lennox International Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Lennox International (LII) FAQ

Lennox International posts a other current liabilities of $370M as of June 2026. That compares with $-220M in the prior-year period — up 266.4% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Lennox International's other current liabilities was $-220M. The latest reading is $370M — a 266.4% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Lennox International's financial statement story. At $370M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for LII's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Lennox International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Lennox International against Industrials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Industrials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $370M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.