BackKirkland Lake Gold Overview

Kirkland Lake Gold Total Current Liabilities

Track Kirkland Lake Gold's total current liabilities ($360M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$359.89M
↓ 26.20% YoYΔ $-127.78M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold (KL) FAQ

Kirkland Lake Gold posts a total current liabilities of $360M as of September 2021. That compares with $490M in the prior-year period — down 26.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kirkland Lake Gold's total current liabilities was $490M. The latest reading is $360M — a 26.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Kirkland Lake Gold's financial statement story. At $360M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KL's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kirkland Lake Gold's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kirkland Lake Gold against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $360M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.