BackKirkland Lake Gold Overview

Kirkland Lake Gold Other Current Liabilities

Track Kirkland Lake Gold's other current liabilities ($120M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$120.41M
326.63% YoYΔ $92.19M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Kirkland Lake Gold (KL) FAQ

Kirkland Lake Gold posts a other current liabilities of $120M as of September 2021. That compares with $28M in the prior-year period — up 326.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Kirkland Lake Gold's other current liabilities was $28M. The latest reading is $120M — a 326.6% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2021). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Kirkland Lake Gold's financial statement story. At $120M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for KL's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Kirkland Lake Gold's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Kirkland Lake Gold against Materials peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Materials are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $120M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.