BackJackson Financial Overview

Jackson Financial Total Current Liabilities

Track Jackson Financial's total current liabilities ($14B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$14.09B
10.48% YoYΔ $-1.65B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Jackson Financial Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Jackson Financial vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Jackson Financial Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Jackson Financial (JXN) FAQ

Jackson Financial posts a total current liabilities of $14B as of June 2026. That compares with $16B in the prior-year period — down 10.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Jackson Financial's total current liabilities was $16B. The latest reading is $14B — a 10.5% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Jackson Financial's financial statement story. At $14B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for JXN's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Jackson Financial's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Jackson Financial against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $14B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.