BackJ2 Global Overview

J2 Global Receivables

Track J2 Global's receivables ($420M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$418.85M
↓ 19.92% YoYΔ $-104.16M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

J2 Global Receivables History

Loading

J2 Global vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

J2 Global Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

J2 Global (JCOM) FAQ

J2 Global (JCOM) currently reports a receivables of $420M as of June 2026. That compares with $520M in the prior-year period — down 19.9% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore J2 Global's receivables history and peer comparisons.

J2 Global's receivables decreased from $520M to $420M — a 19.9% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

J2 Global reported $420M in receivables as of June 2026. That compares with $520M in the prior-year period — down 19.9% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $420M, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for J2 Global, and consider following JCOM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

J2 Global is classified in the Technology sector. On receivables, it currently shows $420M. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing JCOM with unrelated industries.