BackIntelligent Protection Management Overview

Intelligent Protection Management Net Tangible Assets

Latest net tangible assets for IPM: $16M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$16.16M
↓ 18.78% YoYΔ $-3.73M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) FAQ

Intelligent Protection Management posts a net tangible assets of $16M as of June 2026. That compares with $20M in the prior-year period — down 18.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Intelligent Protection Management's net tangible assets was $20M. The latest reading is $16M — a 18.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of Intelligent Protection Management's financial statement story. At $16M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IPM's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Intelligent Protection Management's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Intelligent Protection Management against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $16M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.