BackIntelligent Protection Management Overview

Intelligent Protection Management Intangible Assets

Latest intangible assets for IPM: $7M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Intangible Assets
$6.99M
↓ 19.26% YoYΔ $-1.67M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management Intangible Assets History

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management vs. peers: Intangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management Intangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Intelligent Protection Management (IPM) FAQ

Intelligent Protection Management posts a intangible assets of $7M as of June 2026. That compares with $8.7M in the prior-year period — down 19.3% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Intelligent Protection Management's intangible assets was $8.7M. The latest reading is $7M — a 19.3% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Intangible Assets is one piece of Intelligent Protection Management's financial statement story. At $7M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for IPM's intangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Intelligent Protection Management's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Intelligent Protection Management against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in intangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $7M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.