BackInternational Business Machines Overview

International Business Machines Receivables

Track International Business Machines's receivables ($14B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$14.05B
4.11% YoYΔ $555.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

International Business Machines Receivables History

Loading

International Business Machines vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

International Business Machines Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

International Business Machines (IBM) FAQ

International Business Machines (IBM) currently reports a receivables of $14B as of June 2026. That compares with $13B in the prior-year period — up 4.1% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore International Business Machines's receivables history and peer comparisons.

International Business Machines's receivables increased from $13B to $14B — a 4.1% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

International Business Machines reported $14B in receivables as of June 2026. That compares with $13B in the prior-year period — up 4.1% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $14B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for International Business Machines, and consider following IBM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

International Business Machines is classified in the Technology sector. On receivables, it currently shows $14B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing IBM with unrelated industries.