BackInternational Business Machines Overview

International Business Machines Accounts Payable

Track International Business Machines's accounts payable ($4.4B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$4.39B
10.59% YoYΔ $421.00M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

International Business Machines Accounts Payable History

Loading

International Business Machines vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

International Business Machines Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

International Business Machines (IBM) FAQ

International Business Machines (IBM) currently reports a accounts payable of $4.4B as of June 2026. That compares with $4B in the prior-year period — up 10.6% year over year. Use the charts on this page to explore International Business Machines's accounts payable history and peer comparisons.

International Business Machines's accounts payable increased from $4B to $4.4B — a 10.6% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

International Business Machines reported $4.4B in accounts payable as of June 2026. That compares with $4B in the prior-year period — up 10.6% year over year. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current accounts payable of $4.4B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for International Business Machines, and consider following IBM for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

International Business Machines is classified in the Technology sector. On accounts payable, it currently shows $4.4B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Technology are usually more informative than comparing IBM with unrelated industries.