BackHighest Performances Holdings Overview

Highest Performances Holdings Total Liabilities

Track Highest Performances Holdings's total liabilities ($1.6B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$1.64B
21734.80% YoYΔ $1.63B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings Total Liabilities History

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings (HPH) FAQ

Highest Performances Holdings posts a total liabilities of $1.6B as of June 2024. That compares with $7.5M in the prior-year period — up 21734.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Highest Performances Holdings's total liabilities was $7.5M. The latest reading is $1.6B — a 21734.8% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Highest Performances Holdings's financial statement story. At $1.6B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HPH's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Highest Performances Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Highest Performances Holdings against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $1.6B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.