BackHighest Performances Holdings Overview

Highest Performances Holdings Accounts Payable

Track Highest Performances Holdings's accounts payable ($190M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Accounts Payable
$194.36M
2988.97% YoYΔ $188.07M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings Accounts Payable History

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings vs. peers: Accounts Payable Comparison

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings Accounts Payable Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Highest Performances Holdings (HPH) FAQ

Highest Performances Holdings posts a accounts payable of $190M as of June 2024. That compares with $6.3M in the prior-year period — up 2989.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Highest Performances Holdings's accounts payable was $6.3M. The latest reading is $190M — a 2989.0% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2024). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Accounts Payable is one piece of Highest Performances Holdings's financial statement story. At $190M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HPH's accounts payable usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Highest Performances Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Highest Performances Holdings against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in accounts payable easier to interpret. Start with $190M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.