BackHelios and Matheson Analytics Overview

Helios and Matheson Analytics Total Liabilities

Track Helios and Matheson Analytics's total liabilities ($61M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$60.62M
45.93% YoYΔ $19.08M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics Total Liabilities History

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics (HMNY) FAQ

Helios and Matheson Analytics posts a total liabilities of $61M as of September 2018. That compares with $42M in the prior-year period — up 45.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Helios and Matheson Analytics's total liabilities was $42M. The latest reading is $61M — a 45.9% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of Helios and Matheson Analytics's financial statement story. At $61M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HMNY's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Helios and Matheson Analytics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Helios and Matheson Analytics against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $61M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.