BackHelios and Matheson Analytics Overview

Helios and Matheson Analytics Receivables

Track Helios and Matheson Analytics's receivables ($31M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$30.72M
469.00% YoYΔ $25.32M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics Receivables History

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Helios and Matheson Analytics (HMNY) FAQ

Helios and Matheson Analytics posts a receivables of $31M as of September 2018. That compares with $5.4M in the prior-year period — up 469.0% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Helios and Matheson Analytics's receivables was $5.4M. The latest reading is $31M — a 469.0% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2018). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Helios and Matheson Analytics's financial statement story. At $31M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for HMNY's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Helios and Matheson Analytics's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Helios and Matheson Analytics against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $31M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.