BackCanada Goose Holdings Overview

Canada Goose Holdings Total Current Liabilities

Latest total current liabilities for GOOS: $370M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$369.45M
12.50% YoYΔ $41.05M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings (GOOS) FAQ

Canada Goose Holdings posts a total current liabilities of $370M as of March 2026. That compares with $330M in the prior-year period — up 12.5% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Canada Goose Holdings's total current liabilities was $330M. The latest reading is $370M — a 12.5% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Canada Goose Holdings's financial statement story. At $370M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GOOS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Canada Goose Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Canada Goose Holdings against Consumer Cyclical peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Cyclical are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $370M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.