BackCanada Goose Holdings Overview

Canada Goose Holdings Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for GOOS: $180M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$179.18M
13.82% YoYΔ $-28.72M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Canada Goose Holdings (GOOS) FAQ

Canada Goose Holdings posts a other current liabilities of $180M as of June 2026. That compares with $210M in the prior-year period — down 13.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Canada Goose Holdings's other current liabilities was $210M. The latest reading is $180M — a 13.8% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Canada Goose Holdings's financial statement story. At $180M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for GOOS's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Canada Goose Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Canada Goose Holdings against Consumer Cyclical peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Cyclical are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $180M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.