BackFAT Brands Overview

FAT Brands Receivables

Latest receivables for FAT: $14B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$13.99B
↓ 23.39% YoYΔ $-4.27B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

FAT Brands Receivables History

Loading

FAT Brands vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

FAT Brands Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

FAT Brands (FAT) FAQ

As of the most recent data (September 2025), FAT shows a receivables of $14B. That compares with $18B in the prior-year period — down 23.4% year over year. Scroll down for historical charts and peer comparison views.

Compared with the year-ago period, FAT's receivables is now $14B (was $18B) — a 23.4% year-over-year decrease. Pairing that YoY change with peer averages gives a clearer picture of whether FAT Brands is outperforming or lagging.

Tracking FAT's receivables over time shows whether FAT Brands is scaling, shrinking, or reshaping that part of the business. The current reading is $14B That compares with $18B in the prior-year period — down 23.4% year over year. Multi-quarter patterns matter more than any single print, which is why this page emphasizes history and peer comparison charts.

Besides this receivables page, Stockcircle has FAT Brands's full stock overview, other financial metrics, insider and congress trade tabs, and tools to follow the stock. Together they help you connect receivables (currently $14B) with ownership activity and broader fundamentals.

FAT Brands's receivables is $14B; compare it with other Consumer Staples names on the peer chart. Typical ranges vary by sub-industry, so always sanity-check against the closest competitors, not just the whole sector bucket.