BackDiamondback Energy Overview

Diamondback Energy Receivables

Diamondback Energy's receivables is $2.2B.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$2.16B

Peer average

Loading

Diamondback Energy Receivables History

Loading

Diamondback Energy vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Diamondback Energy Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Balance Sheet Breakdown

Current CashShort Term InvestmentsReceivablesInventoryOther Current AssetsCurrent AssetsLong Term InvestmentsProperty Plant EquipmentGoodwillIntangible AssetsOther AssetsTotal AssetsNet Tangible AssetsAccounts PayableOther Current LiabilitiesTotal Current LiabilitiesLong Term DebtOther LiabilitiesMinority InterestTotal Liabilities

Diamondback Energy (FANG) FAQ

Diamondback Energy (FANG) currently reports a receivables of $2.2B as of March 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Use the charts on this page to explore Diamondback Energy's receivables history and peer comparisons.

Diamondback Energy's receivables changed from $0 to $2.2B (period ending March 2026). Watching multi-year history on the chart below helps separate one-off swings from a lasting trend.

Diamondback Energy reported $2.2B in receivables as of March 2026. In the prior-year period, the figure was $0. Absolute dollar amounts are most useful when compared with prior periods, peers, and related line items such as revenue, assets, or liabilities on Stockcircle.

Start with the current receivables of $2.2B, then check the historical chart for trend and the peer comparison chart for relative positioning. From there, open related valuation or income-statement pages for Diamondback Energy, and consider following FANG for alerts when major investors trade the stock.

Diamondback Energy is classified in the Energy sector. On receivables, it currently shows $2.2B. Sector peers often share similar capital intensity and growth regimes, so relative rankings inside Energy are usually more informative than comparing FANG with unrelated industries.