BackElmira Savings Bank Elmira NY Overview

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY Other Assets

Track Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY's other assets ($620M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Assets
$615.60M
7.85% YoYΔ $44.80M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY Other Assets History

Loading

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY vs. peers: Other Assets Comparison

Loading

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY Other Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY (ESBK) FAQ

Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY posts a other assets of $620M as of September 2019. That compares with $570M in the prior-year period — up 7.8% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY's other assets was $570M. The latest reading is $620M — a 7.8% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2019). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Assets is one piece of Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY's financial statement story. At $620M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ESBK's other assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Elmira Savings Bank Elmira NY against Finance peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Finance are more comparable, which makes gaps in other assets easier to interpret. Start with $620M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.