BackTelefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Overview

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Receivables

Track Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's receivables ($62B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$62.13B
18.66% YoYΔ $9.77B vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Receivables History

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (ERIC) FAQ

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson posts a receivables of $62B as of June 2026. That compares with $52B in the prior-year period — up 18.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's receivables was $52B. The latest reading is $62B — a 18.7% year-over-year increase (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's financial statement story. At $62B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for ERIC's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson against Technology peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Technology are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $62B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.