BackTelefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Overview

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Net Tangible Assets

Track Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net tangible assets ($100B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$104.50B
21.94% YoYΔ $18.80B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson (ERIC) FAQ

As of the most recent data (June 2026), ERIC shows a net tangible assets of $100B. That compares with $86B in the prior-year period — up 21.9% year over year. Scroll down for historical charts and peer comparison views.

Compared with the year-ago period, ERIC's net tangible assets is now $100B (was $86B) — a 21.9% year-over-year increase. Pairing that YoY change with peer averages gives a clearer picture of whether Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is outperforming or lagging.

Tracking ERIC's net tangible assets over time shows whether Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson is scaling, shrinking, or reshaping that part of the business. The current reading is $100B That compares with $86B in the prior-year period — up 21.9% year over year. Multi-quarter patterns matter more than any single print, which is why this page emphasizes history and peer comparison charts.

Besides this net tangible assets page, Stockcircle has Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's full stock overview, other financial metrics, insider and congress trade tabs, and tools to follow the stock. Together they help you connect net tangible assets (currently $100B) with ownership activity and broader fundamentals.

Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson's net tangible assets is $100B; compare it with other Technology names on the peer chart. Typical ranges vary by sub-industry, so always sanity-check against the closest competitors, not just the whole sector bucket.