BackNew Oriental Education & Technology Group Overview

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Total Liabilities

Track New Oriental Education & Technology Group's total liabilities ($3.8B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Liabilities
$3.83B
10.21% YoYΔ $354.63M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Total Liabilities History

Loading

New Oriental Education & Technology Group vs. peers: Total Liabilities Comparison

Loading

New Oriental Education & Technology Group Total Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

New Oriental Education & Technology Group (EDU) FAQ

New Oriental Education & Technology Group posts a total liabilities of $3.8B as of February 2026. That compares with $3.5B in the prior-year period — up 10.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, New Oriental Education & Technology Group's total liabilities was $3.5B. The latest reading is $3.8B — a 10.2% year-over-year increase (period ending February 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Liabilities is one piece of New Oriental Education & Technology Group's financial statement story. At $3.8B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EDU's total liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; New Oriental Education & Technology Group's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging New Oriental Education & Technology Group against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $3.8B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.