BackBrinker International Overview

Brinker International Total Current Liabilities

Track Brinker International's total current liabilities ($680M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$681.40M
2.07% YoYΔ $13.80M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Brinker International Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Brinker International vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Brinker International Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Brinker International (EAT) FAQ

Brinker International posts a total current liabilities of $680M as of March 2026. That compares with $670M in the prior-year period — up 2.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Brinker International's total current liabilities was $670M. The latest reading is $680M — a 2.1% year-over-year increase (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Brinker International's financial statement story. At $680M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EAT's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Brinker International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Brinker International against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $680M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.