BackBrinker International Overview

Brinker International Other Current Liabilities

Track Brinker International's other current liabilities ($300M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$295.70M
55.71% YoYΔ $-371.90M vs prior year quarter

Peer average / median

Loading

Brinker International Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Brinker International vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Brinker International Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Brinker International (EAT) FAQ

Brinker International posts a other current liabilities of $300M as of March 2026. That compares with $670M in the prior-year period — down 55.7% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Brinker International's other current liabilities was $670M. The latest reading is $300M — a 55.7% year-over-year decrease (period ending March 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Brinker International's financial statement story. At $300M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for EAT's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Brinker International's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Brinker International against Consumer Staples peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Staples are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $300M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.