BackChina Distance Education Holdings Overview

China Distance Education Holdings Receivables

Track China Distance Education Holdings's receivables ($15M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Receivables
$15.20M
27.91% YoYΔ $3.32M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings Receivables History

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings vs. peers: Receivables Comparison

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings Receivables Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings (DL) FAQ

China Distance Education Holdings posts a receivables of $15M as of September 2020. That compares with $12M in the prior-year period — up 27.9% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Distance Education Holdings's receivables was $12M. The latest reading is $15M — a 27.9% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2020). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Receivables is one piece of China Distance Education Holdings's financial statement story. At $15M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DL's receivables usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Distance Education Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Distance Education Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in receivables easier to interpret. Start with $15M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.