BackChina Distance Education Holdings Overview

China Distance Education Holdings Net Tangible Assets

Track China Distance Education Holdings's net tangible assets ($78M) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Net Tangible Assets
$77.97M
7.06% YoYΔ $5.14M vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings Net Tangible Assets History

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings vs. peers: Net Tangible Assets Comparison

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings Net Tangible Assets Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

China Distance Education Holdings (DL) FAQ

China Distance Education Holdings posts a net tangible assets of $78M as of September 2020. That compares with $73M in the prior-year period — up 7.1% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, China Distance Education Holdings's net tangible assets was $73M. The latest reading is $78M — a 7.1% year-over-year increase (period ending September 2020). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Net Tangible Assets is one piece of China Distance Education Holdings's financial statement story. At $78M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DL's net tangible assets usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; China Distance Education Holdings's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging China Distance Education Holdings against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in net tangible assets easier to interpret. Start with $78M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.