BackDicks Sporting Goods Overview

Dicks Sporting Goods Total Current Liabilities

Track Dicks Sporting Goods's total current liabilities ($4.8B) with charts, peers, and YoY trends.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Total Current Liabilities
$4.84B
55.64% YoYΔ $1.73B vs prior year quarter

Peer average

Loading

Dicks Sporting Goods Total Current Liabilities History

Loading

Dicks Sporting Goods vs. peers: Total Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Dicks Sporting Goods Total Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Dicks Sporting Goods (DKS) FAQ

Dicks Sporting Goods posts a total current liabilities of $4.8B as of May 2026. That compares with $3.1B in the prior-year period — up 55.6% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Dicks Sporting Goods's total current liabilities was $3.1B. The latest reading is $4.8B — a 55.6% year-over-year increase (period ending May 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Total Current Liabilities is one piece of Dicks Sporting Goods's financial statement story. At $4.8B, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for DKS's total current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Dicks Sporting Goods's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Dicks Sporting Goods against Consumer Discretionary peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Consumer Discretionary are more comparable, which makes gaps in total current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $4.8B here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.