BackCasella Waste Systems Overview

Casella Waste Systems Other Current Liabilities

Latest other current liabilities for CWST: $150M.

Get informed when a big investor buys or sells

+ Follow
Other Current Liabilities
$152.53M
97.22% YoYΔ $-5.32B vs prior year quarter

Peer trimmed avg / median

Loading

Casella Waste Systems Other Current Liabilities History

Loading

Casella Waste Systems vs. peers: Other Current Liabilities Comparison

Loading

Casella Waste Systems Other Current Liabilities Growth (YoY per quarter)

Latest change versus the prior comparable period (same company).

Loading

Casella Waste Systems (CWST) FAQ

Casella Waste Systems posts a other current liabilities of $150M as of June 2026. That compares with $5.5B in the prior-year period — down 97.2% year over year. Comparing that reading with peers and prior periods is usually more useful than looking at the number in isolation.

In the prior comparable period, Casella Waste Systems's other current liabilities was $5.5B. The latest reading is $150M — a 97.2% year-over-year decrease (period ending June 2026). Use the history and growth charts on this page for a longer lookback.

Other Current Liabilities is one piece of Casella Waste Systems's financial statement story. At $150M, it should be interpreted next to related metrics — for example revenue with costs, assets with liabilities, or income with margins. Stockcircle links those related pages so you can move from this number to the surrounding context quickly.

Context for CWST's other current liabilities usually means three checks: (1) trend versus prior periods, (2) level versus peers, and (3) consistency with growth and profitability. This page covers the first two; Casella Waste Systems's other metric pages and overview cover the third.

Judging Casella Waste Systems against Utilities peers is usually better than using a market-wide rule of thumb. Business models inside Utilities are more comparable, which makes gaps in other current liabilities easier to interpret. Start with $150M here, then scan peer and history charts to see if the gap is persistent.